The enforceability of an ITA depends on several factors, one of which is the court before which the case is tried. Some courts that have considered the validity of shrinked film licensing agreements, some ITAs have been declared invalid and have called them membership contracts, unscrupulous and/or unacceptable under the U.C.C - see for example Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology, Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd . Other jurisdictions have found the Shrinkwrap license agreement to be valid and enforceable: See ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, Microsoft v.
Harmony Computers, Novell v. Network Trade Center, and Ariz. Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass`n v. Lexmark Int`l, Inc. may also have some meaning. No court has ruled on the validity of the ESAs in general; Decisions are limited to certain provisions and conditions. The bargaining power of both parties to a licensing agreement often depends on the nature of the product. For example, a film studio that conceded the image of a popular superhero to an action character manufacturer could have considerable bargaining power in this negotiation, as the manufacturer will likely benefit from such a deal. The film studio therefore has the leverage to relocate its activities elsewhere if the manufacturer is cold on its feet. In addition to the details of all parties, the license agreements set out in detail how the licensed parties may use properties, including the following settings: * Free products are subject to the terms of the end user license agreement that is attached to the software download.
. . .